what are new media? 2 (Sep 27, Oct 2)
1.1.4 non-technical and inclusive
1.1.5 Distinguishing between kinds of new media
First of all, Can you say one word difference between analogue and digital.
The answer would be "tool".
When you see analogue machine and digital machine which are totally different.
However, there are no break(gap).
I believed that digital is basic of analogue. That means if analogue didn't exist, digital would not come out.
So I'm trying to say that I can define both of them what is difference.
But they included each other.
Connotation & denotation
When I was young, my mother hung a picture(material was like a carpet) which was drawing "the last supper". Even though I used to going to chulch, I didn't know what story it was..
One day, a friend of my mother's came home and tried to the stroy.
There was a betrayer who was using the fork.(The story was little bit different from Pro.Yoon's)
After that, the picture was not just the picture for me.
Every time I was trying to find who got the fork and remined the story.
I changed the way how to see pictures
Now when I am viewing some artworks, I try to fine what story writers tell us.
I think I have already known what is Connotation & Denotation,
even though I was very young..^^
2007년 9월 29일 토요일
2007년 9월 20일 목요일
What is new media?
what are new media? 1 (Sep 18, Sep 20)
1.1.1 the media as an institution & 1.1.2 the intensity of change
1.1.3 the ideological connotations of the new
At first, What is media?
Media is a kind of method to get to destination which i want to get.
Long time ago, many people thought about media were materials and whatever they
are relevant to media..
However, new media is based on the science..
Like science which has possibility of development, new media also has it.
So new media hasn't be unknown like science..
Nowadays, people combine art and science..maybe those are very familar with each other..
of course, those are totally different ways of study and style..
However, art goes on with science...
This is just my idea, do not say i'm wrong...haha
How about me? what is new for me?
new computer, new boyfriend, new school, new friends ect...
So many things are around me..new stuff which i haven't had before..
But those are very familar with me.
1.1.1 the media as an institution & 1.1.2 the intensity of change
1.1.3 the ideological connotations of the new
At first, What is media?
Media is a kind of method to get to destination which i want to get.
Long time ago, many people thought about media were materials and whatever they
are relevant to media..
However, new media is based on the science..
Like science which has possibility of development, new media also has it.
So new media hasn't be unknown like science..
Nowadays, people combine art and science..maybe those are very familar with each other..
of course, those are totally different ways of study and style..
However, art goes on with science...
This is just my idea, do not say i'm wrong...haha
How about me? what is new for me?
new computer, new boyfriend, new school, new friends ect...
So many things are around me..new stuff which i haven't had before..
But those are very familar with me.
2007년 9월 12일 수요일
Science VS Asthetic
Traditional Thoughts on Art(Sep.11)
I wonder that between science and asthetic are relevent to each other? and are different from each other?
I think both of questions are true..
At first my impression was Science and Asthetic are diffrent from each other because science has to be specific and exact. On the other hand, asthetic which is not correct could be changeable and variable. I still think that my impression was not wrong.
But I will ask you that science is always true?
Science is also changable. Science which we belive exactly could change.
Galilei Galileo belived the earth revolved around the sun which the Romantic Catholic Chunch against with. However revolving the earth now is true.
At that time, they belived wrong science.
We maybe know wrong science now.
In my conclusion, science and asthetic look diffrence but they are very similar.
I wonder that between science and asthetic are relevent to each other? and are different from each other?
I think both of questions are true..
At first my impression was Science and Asthetic are diffrent from each other because science has to be specific and exact. On the other hand, asthetic which is not correct could be changeable and variable. I still think that my impression was not wrong.
But I will ask you that science is always true?
Science is also changable. Science which we belive exactly could change.
Galilei Galileo belived the earth revolved around the sun which the Romantic Catholic Chunch against with. However revolving the earth now is true.
At that time, they belived wrong science.
We maybe know wrong science now.
In my conclusion, science and asthetic look diffrence but they are very similar.
피드 구독하기:
글 (Atom)